ANALYZING THE PROCESS OF A GOOD DEATH: A SCOPING REVIEW

Автори

  • Igal Lifshits Варненски свободен университет image/svg+xml , Lemaanam Organization Physicians for Holocaust survivors (Telemedicine) Автор

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.53606/evfu.26.382-400

Ключови думи :

Good death, Palliative care, end-of-life care

Абстракт

Background
Dying well represents a major challenge for terminal patients, families, and healthcare staff due to emotional, existential, and structural barriers entailed in it.


Aim
To explore how terminal patients, families, and healthcare staff relate to the good death by synthesizing the existing empirical evidence through the prism of the SWOT framework.


Design
A scoping review was conducted to identify and outline key factors enhancing or hindering the process of the good death.


Data Sources
A systematic search via PubMed and JSTOR was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Thirteen empirical studies addressing terminal patients in hospital, hospice, or home care settings were reviewed.


Results
Strengths included a preference for dying at home, effective symptom management, and applying supportive interventions for terminal patients and families. Weaknesses involved inadequate support, limited patient participation in decision-making, and ethical dilemmas delaying end-of-life care. Opportunities focused on improving symptom management with emotional support and strengthening patient- and family-centered care. Threats included overmedicalization, overtreatment, and ethical challenges that hinder a good death.


Conclusion
The good death extends beyond symptom relief and physical condition. Ensuring more patient-centered communication, provision of emotional support, effective symptom management, and overcoming ethical barriers are essential to ensure a good death.

Литература (библиография)

Файлове за сваляне

Публикуван

2026-08-03

Брой

Раздел (Секция)

Статии

Категории

Как да цитирате

Lifshits, I. (2026). ANALYZING THE PROCESS OF A GOOD DEATH: A SCOPING REVIEW. E-Journal VFU, 26, 382-400. https://doi.org/10.53606/evfu.26.382-400